<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YUI-based Image Magnifier Widget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/2007/08/9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/2007/08/9/</link>
	<description>Web Development, Operating System Programming and Amateur Astronomy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:57:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ralf k</title>
		<link>http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/2007/08/9/comment-page-1/#comment-3312</link>
		<dc:creator>ralf k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/?p=9#comment-3312</guid>
		<description>Got it. I&#039;ve surrounded the error here: ...addRule(&quot;v\\:*&quot;,... and because there is still no real solution for the vml-problem in IE8 i&#039;ve fixed it with the compatibiliy mode:



Dirty, but google maps is using it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got it. I&#8217;ve surrounded the error here: &#8230;addRule(&#8220;v\\:*&#8221;,&#8230; and because there is still no real solution for the vml-problem in IE8 i&#8217;ve fixed it with the compatibiliy mode:</p>
<p>Dirty, but google maps is using it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralf k</title>
		<link>http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/2007/08/9/comment-page-1/#comment-3311</link>
		<dc:creator>ralf k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 13:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/?p=9#comment-3311</guid>
		<description>Thanx a lot. This type of magnifier was, what i was looking for. I modified it a little, because of the background and the unlimited scroll issue... You can experience it on http://sebastiandohe.de .
It works very well in Firefox, Opera and Safari, but IE 8 raises strange errors. Perhaps you got a hint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanx a lot. This type of magnifier was, what i was looking for. I modified it a little, because of the background and the unlimited scroll issue&#8230; You can experience it on <a href="http://sebastiandohe.de" rel="nofollow">http://sebastiandohe.de</a> .<br />
It works very well in Firefox, Opera and Safari, but IE 8 raises strange errors. Perhaps you got a hint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien Lecomte</title>
		<link>http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/2007/08/9/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien Lecomte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 23:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/?p=9#comment-46</guid>
		<description>On a Windows box, I get almost the same level of performance on Firefox 2 and Safari 3. The difference you are seeing may be due to specifics of the canvas implementation in Firefox on the Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a Windows box, I get almost the same level of performance on Firefox 2 and Safari 3. The difference you are seeing may be due to specifics of the canvas implementation in Firefox on the Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Platti</title>
		<link>http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/2007/08/9/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Platti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 15:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.julienlecomte.net/blog/?p=9#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Nice job!   It works really well in Safari, IE seems okay (slighly jumpy), and pretty sluggish in Firefox (on a mac at least).  

Do you think there are optimizations possible to make Firefox work better?   IE is probably acceptable.

Sweet dude!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job!   It works really well in Safari, IE seems okay (slighly jumpy), and pretty sluggish in Firefox (on a mac at least).  </p>
<p>Do you think there are optimizations possible to make Firefox work better?   IE is probably acceptable.</p>
<p>Sweet dude!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
